Domino's rejects underpayment claims

Domino's rejects underpayment claims

Domino's Pizza (ASX: DMP) denies it misled franchisees over employee payment terms and has reiterated plans to defend a class action launched by Phi Finney McDonald.

Earlier this week it was revealed the law firm had started the action alleging Domino's underpaid delivery drivers and in-store workers between June 2013 and January 2018.

The restaurant was under fire for allegedly having its franchisee employees work without entitlements like 25 per cent loading for casual work, penalty rates or uniform cleaning allowances.

"If delivery drivers and in-store workers had been properly paid under the Fast Food Industry Award, they would have received these entitlements," Phi Finney McDonald said.

"As a result, most delivery drivers and in-store workers in Australia were paid less than they should have been paid."

In response Domino's claimed it was of the view "those industrial agreements applied to its franchisees at all relevant times".

In an update today, the nation's largest pizza company confirmed it still had not been formally served with the class action court documents but it did have an unsealed copy of documents reportedly filed in the Melbourne Registry of the Federal Court of Australia on 24 June 2019.

"The documents allege that Domino's misled franchisees who, in reliance upon Domino's representations and conduct, paid their employees in accordance with a number of industrial agreements rather than under the Fast Food Industry Award 2010," the company said.

"Domino's confirms that it did not mislead its franchisee employers as to their employee payment obligations.

"The entitlements of franchisee employees during the relevant period were contained in a series of industrial instruments that were lawful, valid and applicable at the time."

Domino's asserted there was no claim that the industrial instruments were not valid at the relevant times.

"The lead applicant claims compensation against Domino's for alleged underpayment by the lead applicant's franchisee employer.

"The lead applicant does not make any claim against his franchisee employer and no franchisee employer is a party to the action.

"The documents do not quantify any loss by the lead applicant or the alleged group. Domino's rejects the allegations made in the documents and intends to defend the action."

Never miss a news update, subscribe here. Follow us on Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram and Twitter.

Business News Australia

Get our daily business news

Sign up to our free email news updates.

 
Finexia’s Childcare Income Fund secures ‘very strong’ rating from Foresight Analytics & Ratings
Partner Content
Private credit specialist Finexia Financial Group (ASX: FNX) has secured a “very...
Finexia
Advertisement

Related Stories

Shakespeare swoops on Woolstore 1888 by Ovolo with plans for new hotel operator

Shakespeare swoops on Woolstore 1888 by Ovolo with plans for new hotel operator

Shakespeare Property Group, the property arm of boutique investment...

Visa Foundation backs First Australians Capital with $2m investment

Visa Foundation backs First Australians Capital with $2m investment

First Australians Capital's (FAC) Catalytic Capital Impact Fund...

AI is making smart devices easier to hack. Here’s how to stay safe

AI is making smart devices easier to hack. Here’s how to stay safe

From asking our smart speakers for the weather to receiving persona...

The ultimate ‘exit interview’ as Bell inquiry told of the human toll on staff at The Star

The ultimate ‘exit interview’ as Bell inquiry told of the human toll on staff at The Star

The former chief financial officer of The Star Entertainment Group ...