NUROFEN FALSE ADVERTISING FINE INCREASED TO RECORD AMOUNT

Written on the 16 December 2016

NUROFEN FALSE ADVERTISING FINE INCREASED TO RECORD AMOUNT RECKITT Benkiser has been slogged an extra $4.3 million by the Federal Court for misleading advertising of its Nurofen Specific Pain products after an Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) appeal against the penalty was upheld.

The UK-based company must now pay a revised penalty of $6 million - the highest recorded for misleading conduct under Australian Consumer Law.

The Full Court found that the initial penalty of $1.7 million was manifestly inadequate given the need for deterrence and the substantial consumer loss suffered.

"The ACCC welcomes this decision, having originally submitted that a penalty of $6 million or higher was appropriate given the longstanding and widespread nature of the conduct, and the substantial sales and profit that was made," says ACCC chairman Rod Sims.

In their joint decision, Justices Jagot, Yates and Bromwich state: "The objective of any penalty in this case must be to ensure that Reckitt Benckiser and other 'would-be wrongdoers' think twice and decide not to act against the strong public interest".

In December 2015, the court found that Reckitt Benckiser made representations on its website and product packaging that Nurofen Specific Pain products were each formulated to specifically treat a particular type of pain, when this was not the case.

In fact, each Nurofen Specific Pain product contains the same active ingredient, ibuprofen lysine 342mg, which treats a wide variety of pain conditions and is no more effective at treating the type of pain described on its packaging than any of the other Nurofen Specific Pain products.

On 29 April 2016, the trial judge Justice Edelman ordered Reckitt Benckiser to pay a penalty of $1.7 million for making misleading representations about its Nurofen Specific Pain products.

The Nurofen decision follows a similar case where Dulux was recently fined $400,000 for false advertising in relation to its Weathershield and InfraCOOL paints.

Sims says the ACCC will continue to advocate for higher penalties for breaches of consumer law to deter other companies from making misleading claims.

Latest News

IN STORE VETS BOOST GREENCROSS' PROFIT

GREENCROSS Limited (ASX: GXL) shares lifted 5 per cent in trading today after the Brisbane-based company posted a ...

AUSTRALIA READY TO DISRUPT GLOBAL CARBON FIBRE MANUFACTURING

AUSTRALIA for the first time has the capacity to produce carbon fibre from scratch and at scale, following the launch...

HONG KONG FUND INVESTS $212.8 MILLION IN G8 EDUCATION

G8 EDUCATION (ASX: GEM) has secured $212.8 million from Hong Kong-based CFCG Investment Partners to pay down debt and...

MERGER DELIVERS THE FINANCIAL GOODS FOR TERRY WHITE

TERRY White Group has posted a solid half-year net profit of $1.3 million amid a period of major transformation fo...

Related News

WHY EMPLOYEE-OWNED COMPANIES ARE BEATING ASX200 SHARE PRICES

EMPLOYEE-owned companies command a higher share price than their publicly listed peers, reaping a 17 per cent prem...

RISE OF THE MACHINES HAS WORKERS SWEATING

UP TO 3.8 million Australian workers are fearful their job may soon be terminated by a robot, a new survey has shown....

LESS TALK, MORE SMALL BUSINESS ACTION IN 2017

THE future growth and prosperity of Australian SMEs could be undermined if governments lose sight of the sector...

TEST DRIVE A POST GRAD AT BOND

THERE'S only one way to really move your career into the fast lane, says Bond University, and 'test driving...

Contact us

Email News Update Sign Up Contact Details
Subscriptions

PO Box 2087
Brisbane QLD 4001

LoginTell a FriendSign Up to Newsletter